<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 21 Jump Street: &quot;My Future&#039;s So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/</link>
	<description>better red than dead</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:51:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah D. Bunting</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43886</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43886</guid>
		<description>Not my ways -- Jenko&#039;s ways!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not my ways &#8212; Jenko&#039;s ways!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43883</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43883</guid>
		<description>I just came by to say that I didn&#039;t think the Nation&#039;s new tagline had permeated my consciousness at all...until I was at lunch today and a toddler behind me was banging a metal plate against the table. I was thisclose to turning around and snapping, &quot;Hey, cut the rebop!&quot;

Your ways are insidious, Sars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came by to say that I didn&#039;t think the Nation&#039;s new tagline had permeated my consciousness at all&#8230;until I was at lunch today and a toddler behind me was banging a metal plate against the table. I was thisclose to turning around and snapping, &#034;Hey, cut the rebop!&#034;</p>
<p>Your ways are insidious, Sars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaybird</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43802</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaybird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43802</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for Sars to hit a 21JS episode that features a young lady (snerk) in one of those modular outfits. You know, the knit full-body jumpsuits, with tube tops/scarves/belts in matching or complementary colors? I&#039;ve been sober for 14 years now, but I think I just might have to drink, and drink deeply, if one of those things rears its fugly head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m waiting for Sars to hit a 21JS episode that features a young lady (snerk) in one of those modular outfits. You know, the knit full-body jumpsuits, with tube tops/scarves/belts in matching or complementary colors? I&#039;ve been sober for 14 years now, but I think I just might have to drink, and drink deeply, if one of those things rears its fugly head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43793</link>
		<dc:creator>C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43793</guid>
		<description>21JS recaps are my new favorite way to procrastinate. Hooray!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21JS recaps are my new favorite way to procrastinate. Hooray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret in CO</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43791</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret in CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43791</guid>
		<description>&quot;Awesome: MS Word recognizes the word &quot;jazzercise&quot; without comment&quot;

Back in the dark ages of Windows 95 &amp; 98, if you opened a word doc, typed in &quot;Unable to follow directions&quot; and then asked the thesaurus, it would suggest replacing that text with &quot;Unable to maintain an erection.&quot; 
I loved that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Awesome: MS Word recognizes the word &#034;jazzercise&#034; without comment&#034;</p>
<p>Back in the dark ages of Windows 95 &amp; 98, if you opened a word doc, typed in &#034;Unable to follow directions&#034; and then asked the thesaurus, it would suggest replacing that text with &#034;Unable to maintain an erection.&#034;<br />
I loved that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz in Minneapolis</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43784</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz in Minneapolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43784</guid>
		<description>Every era has hideous things and every person has styles they should never wear, but the seventies were pretty uniformly horrible for everyone - you really have to go into couture to find uniquely 70&#039;s-styled things that fit basic human parameters of attractiveness. My parents were just old enough not to go too far overboard, except for the time Mom made all four of us matching outfits from a navy and white plaid polyester. She and I had skirts and kercheifs, which were fine, and my then 5-year-old brother was very cute in his shorts and short-sleeved jacket - but Dad&#039;s Bermuda shorts and short-sleeved jacket? URGH.

I could be delusional, remembering how nice and comfy they were, but I think the shaker v-neck is something of a classic, as much as it is an instant marker of 1985. I still have my turquoise Limited shaker v-neck and the turquoise Limited anklets I bought to match it - plus the two JC Penny knockoffs of the same sweater in pink and yellow. I&#039;d still be wearing them if I hadn&#039;t gained an entire body-weight since then.

Likewise, I hold on to my dusty rose Outback Red cardigan with the fancy openwork/Battenburg-type front from 1989 or so, which I saw someone wearing in the skyway LAST MONTH. Granted, Outback Red was going for a type of vintage elegance, and that&#039;s much easier to sustain as a valid look through the years than, say, parachute pants and a sweatshirt with the sleeves cut off.

At any rate, over the years as I&#039;ve gained weight and sifted through all the clothes I&#039;m saving for when I lose it (yeah, well, there are worse hopeless goals than returning to one&#039;s healthy high school weight) it has been obvious in hindsight what I bought because it was right for me, no matter how stylish, and what I bought mostly just because it was stylish, and it&#039;s the former stuff that has been saved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every era has hideous things and every person has styles they should never wear, but the seventies were pretty uniformly horrible for everyone &#8211; you really have to go into couture to find uniquely 70&#039;s-styled things that fit basic human parameters of attractiveness. My parents were just old enough not to go too far overboard, except for the time Mom made all four of us matching outfits from a navy and white plaid polyester. She and I had skirts and kercheifs, which were fine, and my then 5-year-old brother was very cute in his shorts and short-sleeved jacket &#8211; but Dad&#039;s Bermuda shorts and short-sleeved jacket? URGH.</p>
<p>I could be delusional, remembering how nice and comfy they were, but I think the shaker v-neck is something of a classic, as much as it is an instant marker of 1985. I still have my turquoise Limited shaker v-neck and the turquoise Limited anklets I bought to match it &#8211; plus the two JC Penny knockoffs of the same sweater in pink and yellow. I&#039;d still be wearing them if I hadn&#039;t gained an entire body-weight since then.</p>
<p>Likewise, I hold on to my dusty rose Outback Red cardigan with the fancy openwork/Battenburg-type front from 1989 or so, which I saw someone wearing in the skyway LAST MONTH. Granted, Outback Red was going for a type of vintage elegance, and that&#039;s much easier to sustain as a valid look through the years than, say, parachute pants and a sweatshirt with the sleeves cut off.</p>
<p>At any rate, over the years as I&#039;ve gained weight and sifted through all the clothes I&#039;m saving for when I lose it (yeah, well, there are worse hopeless goals than returning to one&#039;s healthy high school weight) it has been obvious in hindsight what I bought because it was right for me, no matter how stylish, and what I bought mostly just because it was stylish, and it&#039;s the former stuff that has been saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaybird</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaybird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43768</guid>
		<description>Hee. I just wondered where the line is or should be drawn. I was the single most battered fashion victim of the 80s. There are photos of me from 1987 in which about 40% of my spiral-permed hair would NOT fit into a photo, not even with a wide-angle lens, and at the time, that was a badge of honor. (Every decade apparently has its &quot;6&#039;3&quot; with the afro&quot;.) Now, of course, it&#039;s grounds for murder or at least public abandonment.  

I go now to cut the rebop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hee. I just wondered where the line is or should be drawn. I was the single most battered fashion victim of the 80s. There are photos of me from 1987 in which about 40% of my spiral-permed hair would NOT fit into a photo, not even with a wide-angle lens, and at the time, that was a badge of honor. (Every decade apparently has its &#034;6&#039;3&#034; with the afro&#034;.) Now, of course, it&#039;s grounds for murder or at least public abandonment.  </p>
<p>I go now to cut the rebop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah D. Bunting</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43755</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43755</guid>
		<description>@Jay: Hey, cut the rebop!

Seriously: I don&#039;t really know. I wasn&#039;t a religious watcher of this particular show, but I did watch 90210 pretty regularly, and I can remember looking at certain outfits on that show, as a contemporary watcher, and thinking, &quot;I don&#039;t know what&#039;s going on there.&quot;

Looking at it from another angle, Hoffs&#039;s attire is an interesting case study, because it just wasn&#039;t my style back then; I didn&#039;t do the top-to-toe denim/giant earrings/side ponytail thing. But Hoffs looks pretty good in her Bongo jeans and six kazillion pins on her jean jacket. Hasselhoff looked good in his super-dark-rinse Wranglers; the girls on &lt;em&gt;Felicity&lt;/em&gt; looked good in their crazy-tight choker necklaces. Those things aren&#039;t the style anymore, but at the time, they were, and they were flattering, or could be. 

There&#039;s a picture of my mom from when I was a baby, and she&#039;s wearing this orange belted-jumpsuit...device of some sort, and the jumpsuit is just a function of living in 1974 and trying to keep up with the fashions, so I forgive her for that part of it (and in old photos, generally speaking, Ma may be wearing dated clothes, but they aren&#039;t wearing her, at least; they&#039;re out of style but she looks appropriate). But the Tangelo Mom In Space look is just REALLY not a good one for her and shouldn&#039;t have been attempted, as she will be the first -- and second, and 1867th -- to tell you.

So I guess it&#039;s kind of the difference between &quot;that was the style of the time&quot; and &quot;that just doesn&#039;t look good, &#039;in&#039; or not, and you should have put your foot down.&quot; I mean, those big rolled-sleeve blazers have come back in, but they made me look like Bea Arthur the first time around and I ain&#039;t paying for that ride again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jay: Hey, cut the rebop!</p>
<p>Seriously: I don&#039;t really know. I wasn&#039;t a religious watcher of this particular show, but I did watch 90210 pretty regularly, and I can remember looking at certain outfits on that show, as a contemporary watcher, and thinking, &#034;I don&#039;t know what&#039;s going on there.&#034;</p>
<p>Looking at it from another angle, Hoffs&#039;s attire is an interesting case study, because it just wasn&#039;t my style back then; I didn&#039;t do the top-to-toe denim/giant earrings/side ponytail thing. But Hoffs looks pretty good in her Bongo jeans and six kazillion pins on her jean jacket. Hasselhoff looked good in his super-dark-rinse Wranglers; the girls on <em>Felicity</em> looked good in their crazy-tight choker necklaces. Those things aren&#039;t the style anymore, but at the time, they were, and they were flattering, or could be. </p>
<p>There&#039;s a picture of my mom from when I was a baby, and she&#039;s wearing this orange belted-jumpsuit&#8230;device of some sort, and the jumpsuit is just a function of living in 1974 and trying to keep up with the fashions, so I forgive her for that part of it (and in old photos, generally speaking, Ma may be wearing dated clothes, but they aren&#039;t wearing her, at least; they&#039;re out of style but she looks appropriate). But the Tangelo Mom In Space look is just REALLY not a good one for her and shouldn&#039;t have been attempted, as she will be the first &#8212; and second, and 1867th &#8212; to tell you.</p>
<p>So I guess it&#039;s kind of the difference between &#034;that was the style of the time&#034; and &#034;that just doesn&#039;t look good, &#039;in&#039; or not, and you should have put your foot down.&#034; I mean, those big rolled-sleeve blazers have come back in, but they made me look like Bea Arthur the first time around and I ain&#039;t paying for that ride again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaybird</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaybird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43752</guid>
		<description>Sars, here&#039;s something I&#039;ve wanted to ask you, in re: 21JS recaps, and other vintage stuff: To what degree can you (or I, anyone) forgive the tacky, considering that it was a product of the times? I mean, some of the goofiness can be accounted for simply because it was the 1980s and they were still beta-testing dirt. Surely in 20 or 25 years, people will be looking back on their 2009 high school yearbooks and shuddering/giggling/dryheaving, despite the fact that right now their hair, slang and fashion choices seem achingly cool.

Of course, some of that crap really is pitiful and stupid, no matter WHEN it was perpetrated. (See: Above Cosby-sweater photo. LYMAN FARGIN&#039; WARD never dressed like that.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sars, here&#039;s something I&#039;ve wanted to ask you, in re: 21JS recaps, and other vintage stuff: To what degree can you (or I, anyone) forgive the tacky, considering that it was a product of the times? I mean, some of the goofiness can be accounted for simply because it was the 1980s and they were still beta-testing dirt. Surely in 20 or 25 years, people will be looking back on their 2009 high school yearbooks and shuddering/giggling/dryheaving, despite the fact that right now their hair, slang and fashion choices seem achingly cool.</p>
<p>Of course, some of that crap really is pitiful and stupid, no matter WHEN it was perpetrated. (See: Above Cosby-sweater photo. LYMAN FARGIN&#039; WARD never dressed like that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KAB</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/21-jump-street-my-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-wear-shades/comment-page-1/#comment-43719</link>
		<dc:creator>KAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4233#comment-43719</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to note that The Limited has re-introduced the Forenza sweater. It&#039;s not in the original V-neck, but still. Could Outback Red be far behind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to note that The Limited has re-introduced the Forenza sweater. It&#039;s not in the original V-neck, but still. Could Outback Red be far behind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

