<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tomato Nation &#187; Oscars 2010 Death Race</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomatonation.com/tag/oscars-2010-death-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomatonation.com</link>
	<description>better red than dead</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:45:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oscars Death Race: Conclusion and Pool Recs</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/oscars-death-race-conclusion-and-pool-recs/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/oscars-death-race-conclusion-and-pool-recs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=5495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Well, friends, I gave it my best, but I couldn&#039;t manage to watch them all. The final score is Sarah 50, Death Race 8 (86-ish percent) and 20 out of 24 categories completed (83 percent). ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6116" title="hurt-locker" src="http://tomatonation.com/media/hurt-locker-200x113.jpg" alt="hurt-locker" width="200" height="113" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Well, friends, I gave it my best, but I couldn&#039;t manage to watch them all. The final score is <strong>Sarah 50, Death Race 8 (86-ish percent) and 20 out of 24 categories completed (83 percent)</strong>. I&#039;d hoped to cram in another movie or two today, but I had to act in a music video (&#8230;I know), so that didn&#039;t work out.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In case anyone cares, I&#039;ve listed my recommendations for your Oscar-pool picks after the jump.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-5495"></span><strong>Best Picture</strong><br />
Should win: <em>Hurt Locker</em>.<br />
Will win: <em>Avatar</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Actor</strong><br />
Should win: I&#039;m told Firth was amazing, but I didn&#039;t get around to seeing <em>A Single Man</em>. Of the nominees I saw, Bridges and Renner did equally good work.<br />
Will win: Bridges.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Actress</strong><br />
Should win: Tough call. Sidibe is excellent, but I have to vote Streep. Or, really, anyone but Bullock.<br />
Will win: Bullock, much as it pains me.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong><br />
Should win: Everyone in the category did great work; I&#039;d like to see Harrelson rewarded for raising his game.<br />
Will win: Christoph Waltz, which is fine with me.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Supporting Actress</strong><br />
Should win: Wildly different performances make &#034;should&#034; a tough call. Kendrick or Mo&#039;Nique.<br />
Will win: Mo&#039;Nique.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Director</strong><br />
Should win: I said elsewhere that all these directors did achieve a great deal in different areas of directing (except Reitman, who was kind of average). Any other year, Tarantino might have gotten it for showing some mature depth at last. This year, it&#039;s between Bigelow and Cameron.<br />
Will win: Bigelow.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Original Screenplay</strong><br />
Should win: <em>Inglourious Basterds</em>.<br />
Will win: <em>Inglourious Basterds</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Adapted Screenplay</strong><br />
Should win: <em>In the Loop</em>.<br />
Will win: Woof, what a dog&#039;s breakfast this category is. If <em>District 9</em> is winning anything, it&#039;s this, but I have no idea how this will go. <em>In the Loop</em> or <em>Up in the Air</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Cinematography</strong><br />
Should win: <em>The White Ribbon</em>.<br />
Will win: <em>Avatar</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Editing</strong><br />
Should win: Hell, I don&#039;t know. The hallmark of good editing is often, but not always, that you don&#039;t notice it&#8230;but that doesn&#039;t help me narrow it down. <em>Hurt Locker</em> it is, I guess.<br />
Will win: <em>Hurt Locker</em> or <em>Inglourious Basterds</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Art Direction</strong><br />
Should win: In terms of absolutely, fully realizing the visual tone, <em>Nine</em>.<br />
Will win: It&#039;s hard to say with some of these techier categories how willing the voters will be to just give <em>Avatar</em> everything. I tend to err on the side of assuming they&#039;ll think it through, which I shouldn&#039;t do. <em>Avatar</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Costume Design</strong><br />
Should win: All extremely good. I liked <em>Bright Star</em>&#039;s version the best.<br />
Will win: I really have no idea, because I have no background in fashion history and I have no idea whether that&#039;s something the voters use to judge this category. <em>Nine</em> or <em>Coco avant Chanel</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Makeup</strong><br />
Should win: I don&#039;t know how this should be judged either. Let&#039;s use &#034;had the furthest to go, and got there&#034; as the metric, and call it for <em>Star Trek</em>.<br />
Will win: Like I said, not sure of the metric here, but what the hell. <em>Star Trek</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Original Score</strong><br />
Should win: Oh my god, <em>Up</em> by a landslide.<br />
Will win: <em>Up</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Original Song</strong><br />
Should win: I didn&#039;t care for any of these nominees and think the wrong songs from both <em>Crazy Heart</em> and <em>Nine</em> got nominated. &#034;The Weary Kind&#034; is slightly less boring than the others.<br />
Will win: I feel like <em>The Princess and the Frog</em> wins here, I don&#039;t know why. &#034;Down in New Orleans&#034; is by-number gumboid dreck, but it probably wins. &#034;The Weary Kind&#034; is a safe choice too, though.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Sound Mixing</strong><br />
Should win: <em>Hurt Locker.</em><br />
Will win: <em>Hurt Locker</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Sound Editing</strong><br />
Should win: <em>Inglourious Basterds</em>. The creaking in that opening sequence is unbearable.<br />
Will win: <em>Avatar</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Visual Effects</strong><br />
Should win: <em>Avatar</em>.<br />
Will win: <em>Avatar</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Animated Feature</strong><br />
Should win: <em>Up</em>.<br />
Will win: <em>Up</em>, probably, but a vote for <em>Fantastic Mr. Fox</em> is not misplaced.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Foreign Language Film</strong><br />
Should win: I only saw three of them; all three are outstanding, in different ways. The most notable achievement is <em>The White Ribbon</em>&#039;s.<br />
Will win: <em>The White Ribbon</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Documentary Feature</strong><br />
Should win: I didn&#039;t see <em>Which Way Home</em>, but of the other four, I thought <em>Daniel Ellsberg</em> was the most effective and well paced.<br />
Will win: I have no idea. Probably not <em>The Cove</em>, but any other vote would make sense to me. Based on the subject matter, <em>Which Way Home</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Documentary Short</strong><br />
Should win: No idea. I only saw one; it was affecting, but doesn&#039;t necessarily seem like Oscar-winning material.<br />
Will win: <em>Krolik po berlinsku</em>. I&#8230;think.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Animated Short</strong><br />
Should win: <em>Logorama</em>.<br />
Will win: <em>Wallace and Gromit</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Best Live-Action Short</strong><br />
Should win: <em>Istallet for abrakadabra</em> is my favorite; it has problems, but it also has spirit and great comic timing.<br />
Will win: <em>The Door</em>, alas, but <em>The New Tenants </em>could surprise us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/oscars-death-race-conclusion-and-pool-recs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Last Station</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-last-station/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-last-station/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Plummer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helen Mirren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James McAvoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=5492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A handful of nice moments &#8212; most of them from McAvoy, who isn&#039;t nominated &#8212; but one review I read called the movie an acting showcase more than a plot, and I&#039;d have to agree. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">A handful of nice moments &#8212; most of them from McAvoy, who isn&#039;t nominated &#8212; but one review I read called the movie an acting showcase more than a plot, and I&#039;d have to agree. It&#039;s a little draggy, and many of the characters seem written without regard for the era.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Mirren is good, as is Plummer, but it&#039;s average work from each of them, and neither of them is going to win.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Sarah 50, Death Race 8; 20 of 24 categories completed</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-last-station/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>El Secreto de Sus Ojos</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/el-secreto-de-sus-ojos/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/el-secreto-de-sus-ojos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=5489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great movie. Here&#039;s how I could tell: the version I saw had, bar none, the worst subtitling I&#039;ve ever seen, and I have watched a fair amount of bootleg kung-fu in my ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">This is a great movie. Here&#039;s how I could tell: the version I saw had, bar none, the worst subtitling I&#039;ve ever seen, and I have watched a fair amount of bootleg kung-fu in my life. I guess it&#039;s nice to see the Chicago font getting some work, but good grief.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In spite of that, I was riveted, for many of the same reasons I loved <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000G1R4TI?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=tomatonation-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B000G1R4TI" target="_blank"><em>Epitafios</em></a>. It&#039;s got the leading man who&#039;s pretty average-looking, even lumpen, but is so charismatic that you want to make out with him after about an hour; it&#039;s got the Taking! It! Personally! feel, but played effectively and relatably; it&#039;s got the steady, but not spoon-fed, build of information that culminates in &#034;what the&hellip;wow, holy shit&#034; at the end; it stays with you for days afterwards. Is this a thing in Argentine culture, dark procedurals featuring obsessed paunchy guys who call everyone &#034;motherfucker,&#034; have tortured relationships with educated women with great hair, and put their indispensable sidekicks in grave peril? Because Argentina <em>really</em> does that well, and it happens to be Bunting-nip.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">If you have seen it: Sandoval. Man. I felt like I knew him personally; pitch-perfect writing and rendition. If you haven&#039;t seen it, please go; I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll get workable subtitles, but if you don&#039;t, seriously, you won&#039;t even need them.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Sarah 49, Death Race 9; 18 of 24 categories completed</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/el-secreto-de-sus-ojos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/nine/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/nine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federico Fellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judi Dench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicole Kidman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penelope Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shut up musicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=5485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone looks beautiful, the acting is good (with one semi-exception), and Nine successfully evokes Fellini, but I don&#039;t think I see the point of the exercise, here or in the stage original. That the dialogue ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Everyone looks beautiful, the acting is good (with one semi-exception), and <em>Nine</em> successfully evokes Fellini, but I don&#039;t think I see the point of the exercise, here or in the stage original. That the dialogue exists almost entirely in English with hammy Italian accents (Dench apparently refused even to bother, which is refreshing) doesn&#039;t help, and when it&#039;s added to the built-in contrivance of the musical genre, the result is forced.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Penelope Cruz is quite genuine and appealing, and it&#039;s in contrast to Nicole Kidman, who presents as very artificial. The movie isn&#039;t going for realism, obviously, but everyone else is committed to the concept. Kidman seems primarily concerned with posing, reminding the camera that she&#039;s A Great Beauty, and she&#039;s a better actress than that, plus the implied smugness is off-putting. Perhaps this is the point, but it didn&#039;t integrate very well for me.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Pretty to look at, but ultimately unsatisfying.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Sarah 49, Death Race 9; 18 of 24 categories completed</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/nine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The White Ribbon</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-white-ribbon/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-white-ribbon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burghart Klaussner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria-Victoria Dragus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=5196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is, I believe, the presumptive favorite for Best Foreign Film, with good reason. I&#039;ve only seen one of the other nominees, and it&#039;s good, but The White Ribbon is in another class entirely; it&#039;s ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">This is, I believe, the presumptive favorite for Best Foreign Film, with good reason. I&#039;ve only seen one of the other nominees, and it&#039;s good, but <em>The White Ribbon</em> is in another class entirely; it&#039;s like comparing apples to needles.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The narration invites the viewer immediately to draw parallels between the events shown and the rise of National Socialism in Germany, and it&#039;s interesting to see how events unfold once that&#039;s been put in your head, but what the movie really excels at is creating an uncomfortable, oppressive atmosphere. The director shot the movie in color but printed it in black-and-white, and some scenes turn out so dark that you can&#039;t see what&#039;s going on &#8212; and you find yourself both straining towards the screen and cringing away from it. Even sunlit scenes seem chilly somehow, cooled by an invisible shadow.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-5196"></span>The casting is excellent, especially the fathers, all of whom treat their &#034;loved&#034; ones (read: those under their control) with steady and entitled cruelty. The pastor in particular, unaware (or, perhaps, content) that his manipulations and shaming have sown the seeds of antisocial disorders in his children, is played without fear by Burghart Klaussner, and as a physical type, he&#039;s a perfect fit: jowly, his lips pressed thin by decades of sanctimonious frowning. Ditto Maria-Victoria Dragus, whose rendition of an unblinking tween sociopath is pitilessly creepy.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In the end, it&#039;s hard to say what exactly has happened or who exactly is responsible. The community reacts in horror at certain crimes against children; others are considered merely the way of things. Some vengeance is expected, other vengeance is denounced. The women are not so much abused as worn away. Blame is laid on the right people for the wrong things. Justice is not achieved, because it is barely sought. As an exploration of the roots of Nazism and the society that gave its permission to it, <em>The White Ribbon</em> answers the question of why with &#034;&hellip;because.&#034; As such, it&#039;s believable, and very depressing.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">This is not a fun movie to watch, but it&#039;s done extremely well, and I will be very surprised if it doesn&#039;t win the category.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Sarah 47, Death Race 11; 14 of 24 categories completed</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-white-ribbon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-most-dangerous-man-in-america-daniel-ellsberg-and-the-pentagon-papers/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-most-dangerous-man-in-america-daniel-ellsberg-and-the-pentagon-papers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Ellsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Kissinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=5192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For my tenth birthday, my mother got me a framed copy of the front page of the New York Times from the day I was born. The big headline is about food costs pushing up ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-5193" title="nixon_bowling_5_8" src="http://tomatonation.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nixon_bowling_5_8-150x150.jpg" alt="nixon_bowling_5_8" width="150" height="150" />For my tenth birthday, my mother got me a framed copy of the front page of the <em>New York Times</em> from the day I was born. The big headline is about food costs pushing up the price index; other above-the-fold news included items about a summer-job initiative backed by Nixon, testimony on a fund alleged to have sponsored foment in Chile, and the conclusion of the siege of Rach Bap in Vietnam.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">None of these resonates much today, not compared with two headlines below the fold: &#034;Court Quashes Subpoenas on Watergate Reporting&#034; (Nixon&#039;s team tried and failed to get reporters to turn over unpublished material), and &#034;Ellsberg Backed On Access To Data&#034; (the government did not own the copy of the Pentagon report that Ellsberg copied).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Even as a kid, I knew that the Ellsberg and Watergate headlines were the lasting news, but despite having that front page hanging in every bedroom I&#039;ve lived in since 1983, I never learned the specifics of Ellsberg&#039;s case until watching the documentary, and it&#039;s quite amazing. The movie gilds the lily a bit with the tensely shot re-enactments and the <em>Mission: Impossible</em>-esque score, but it doesn&#039;t change the essential fact: that this one guy, after trying and failing to make the best of a bad job vis-Ã -vis the Vietnam &#034;conflict,&#034; finally decided that no ethical option remained except to rat out five administrations for their cynical actions in Southeast Asia. And he assumed he would go to jail for it, but he felt he had no choice.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-5192"></span>What&#039;s striking about Ellsberg&#039;s stand is not just its courage; it&#039;s that subsequent administrations have learned nothing from Nixon&#039;s paranoid bungling of the consequences. And most striking of all, as always, is that Nixon is, in the end, such a pathetic asshole. The American people had little way of knowing the extent of it then, of course, but he and Kissinger have a conversation in which Nixon expresses the desire to hurry the entire Vietnam process up by dropping a nuclear bomb on &#034;that shit-ass little country&#034; and having done with it, and Kissinger naysays it &#8212; because it would be a PR problem. I understand that the conversation was not meant for public consumption, but even in a private meeting &#8212; this is what you say? This is who you are? The equivalent of &#034;Nuke &#039;em all and let God sort &#039;em out,&#034; followed by &#034;You can&#039;t do that, sir, it looks bad&#034;? Not that I don&#039;t still wonder how this country went back for a second helping of W., but&hellip;ain&#039;t nothing new under the sun. Sadly.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">It&#039;s an interesting movie, easy to follow, doesn&#039;t try to do too much. I appreciated the footage of present-day Ellsberg continuing to lie down in front of police vans at war protests and let himself get arrested; it&#039;s not easy to live one&#039;s beliefs all the time, but it&#039;s nice to see that it&#039;s worthwhile on occasion.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Sarah 47, Death Race 11; 14 of 24 categories completed</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-most-dangerous-man-in-america-daniel-ellsberg-and-the-pentagon-papers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Turturro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meryl Streep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Allen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=5174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually enjoyed it, because I expected to hate it, and while it is definitely bad &#8212; buys into its own pompous mythos, takes too long to explain a conflict nobody cares about, thinks it&#039;s ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">I actually enjoyed it, because I expected to hate it, and while it is definitely bad &#8212; buys into its own pompous mythos, takes too long to explain a conflict nobody cares about, thinks it&#039;s funny when it isn&#039;t &#8212; it also has a few fun bits.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">It helps that it&#039;s cast with people who, in one sense, &#034;don&#039;t belong&#034; in a franchise like <em>Transformers</em>, but because Julie White and John Turturro needed the money (I assume), it makes the whole project more interesting. Turturro seems to have decided that the writing is terrible, but he signed a contract, so he might as well give it 100 percent, and he does.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Everyone does; the movie&#039;s execution is very good. That&#039;s the thing with steroid-popcorn fare like <em>Transformers</em> &#8212; you have to look at it for what it is, and not complain about what it isn&#039;t. It isn&#039;t subtle. It isn&#039;t going to give you the small, sharply observed moments. Megan Fox isn&#039;t Meryl Streep &#8212; so what? You want Meryl Streep, go to <a href="http://tomatonation.com/?p=4424" target="_blank">a movie with Meryl Streep in it</a>. You want a bunch of shit to blow up while Megan Fox dashes around pouting and having taut abs, you go to <em>Transformers</em>. Michael Bay does, well, Michael Bay movies, and he does them really well; if you use a Woody Allen ruler to measure them, that&#039;s kind of on you.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I&#039;ve gotten tired of commentary on <em>Transformers</em> and its ilk that doesn&#039;t review the movie, but rather can&#039;t wait to indict movies made for teenage boys for cheapening the culture (and also gas on about how much smarter than the material the reviewer is). I agree that, if big-budget toy-tie-in kablamotrons like <em>Transformers</em> take money away from smaller projects, it&#039;s a shame, but there isn&#039;t anything <em>per se</em> wrong with a movie that basically only exists to rig explosions &#8212; and not every quirky indie is <em>per se</em> better at what it does than <em>Transformers</em> or <em>The A Team</em>, or even very good at all.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Sarah 47, Death Race 11; 14 of 24 categories completed</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ajami</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/ajami/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/ajami/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best part of the Oscars Death Race project is the nice surprises: the films I expected to have to endure that gripped me instead.
I faced Ajami as one does a hated vegetable, and got ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">The best part of the Oscars Death Race project is the nice surprises: the films I expected to have to endure that gripped me instead.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I faced <em>Ajami</em> as one does a hated vegetable, and got a delicious stew instead. The story is meticulously put together, and unfolds in the manner of a Spirograph drawing; whether the <em>Rashomon</em>-esque structure crosses the line from formal into mannered is perhaps a matter of taste, but it worked for me, for two reasons: 1) a handful of events seen in retelling went in unexpected, but tidy, directions, and 2) the formality serves as a sort of elegy for the events themselves.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I&#039;m purposefully vague to avoid spoiling not the plot, but the framework; it&#039;s worth a watch. American directors should take note that this is how you frame violence effectively, with as much quiet as loud banging and as much messy scuffling as operatic swoons backward. When it feels like a report instead of a story, you&#039;ve done something right.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Sarah 44, Death Race 14; 12 of 24 categories completed</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/ajami/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coco avant Chanel</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/coco-avant-chanel/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/coco-avant-chanel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alessandro Nivola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audrey Tautou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benoit Poelvoorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coco Chanel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s hard to tell if the movie intends to portray Gabrielle &#034;Coco&#034; Chanel as morally compromised and often bratty, as part of a larger conversation about the forging of genius. If so, the script could ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s hard to tell if the movie intends to portray Gabrielle &#034;Coco&#034; Chanel as morally compromised and often bratty, as part of a larger conversation about the forging of genius. If so, the script could have stood to make that clearer, but if not, Coco as portrayed here isn&#039;t impossible to spend time with; you just find yourself wishing that she&#039;d light a fire under it already if she&#039;s not going to stay with Balsan.</p>
<p>The movie has heavy atmosphere, though; you get a sense of the coexisting claustrophobia and rudderlessness that attend being kept in that way. The acting is very good too, especially Benoit Poelvoorde and Alessandro Nivola. Roles like theirs in a bio-pic like this can come out cardboard no matter what you do, but Balsan and Capel have depth here. Nivola&#039;s choices seem a little Regency-novel initially, but stick with him, he turns it around.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The end is a bit tired, all the reflections in the mirrors and the flashbacks, but it makes a nice moment for Tautou, who prior to that isn&#039;t called on to do much but pose and glare.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Sarah 43, Death Race 15; 12 of 24 categories completed</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/coco-avant-chanel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Young Victoria</title>
		<link>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-young-victoria/</link>
		<comments>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-young-victoria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah D. Bunting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture and Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Blunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Strong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2010 Death Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatonation.com/?p=4510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first hour is diverting, with beautiful costumes and some interesting shot-making, but in the end, the movie tries to do too much and doesn&#039;t pull it off. The last five minutes throw their hands ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">The first hour is diverting, with beautiful costumes and some interesting shot-making, but in the end, the movie tries to do too much and doesn&#039;t pull it off. The last five minutes throw their hands up and resort to a montage/title-card mash-up sort of a thing in an attempt to make the whole movie about the great romance between Victoria and Albert &#8212; careworn territory that&#039;s the least interesting subplot in an late adolescence crammed full of them.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Emily Blunt is quite good, but the writing that wants to examine the conflict between Victoria the monarch and Victoria the wife lets her down a bit. Mark Strong is <a href="http://tomatonation.com/?p=4302" target="blank">again a disappointment</a>. Not bad, but should have been better.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Sarah 43, Death Race 15; 12 of 24 categories completed</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomatonation.com/culture-and-criticism/the-young-victoria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

