Baseball

“I wrote 63 songs this year. They’re all about Jeter.” Just kidding. The game we love, the players we hate, and more.

Culture and Criticism

From Norman Mailer to Wendy Pepper — everything on film, TV, books, music, and snacks (shut up, raisins), plus the Girls’ Bike Club.

Donors Choose and Contests

Helping public schools, winning prizes, sending a crazy lady in a tomato costume out in public.

Stories, True and Otherwise

Monologues, travelogues, fiction, and fart humor. And hens. Don’t forget the hens.

The Vine

The Tomato Nation advice column addresses your questions on etiquette, grammar, romance, and pet misbehavior. Ask The Readers about books or fashion today!

Home » The Vine

The Vine: May 2, 2006

Submitted by on May 2, 2006 – 7:05 PMNo Comment

Oh Grammar Great One,

I know you must get sick of these, but I’ve come across different answers to this one from different people.When a hyphenated word is in a title, do you capitalize both parts?For instance, “Harry Potter and the Half-blood Prince” or “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince”?

Lawyer in Limbo

Dear Limbo,

I would capitalize the second part, yes, because I think it looks weird otherwise.But I can’t really back that up with a rule, off the top of my head, and Garner doesn’t have a specific note on it that I can find; let’s see what the Chicago Manual has to say.

…HA HA HA, that’s awesome.I got a new edition of the CM for my birthday, and what should I find when I turn to the table of contents?Chapter 5, Grammar and Usage, written by…Bryan A. Garner.Fantastic….Anyway, moving right along to 8.168-70, which says…that you can do it either way, basically.

8.169: “Capitalize only the first element unless any subsequent element is a proper noun or adjective.”

8.170 is about the “more traditional rules,” which states, “(1) Always capitalize the first element. (2) Capitalize any subsequent elements unless they are articles, prepositions, coordinating conjunctions…or [musical] modifiers.”

All of this is preceded by a note explaining that, while the first rule is simpler, it is “beloved of some but disdained by others” — and that the editors of the Chicago Manual prefer the second.

So, the short version: leaving the “-blood” lowercase is not incorrect.It is also not preferred.

Hey Sars,

This is not so much a question as it is me venting and asking you to please educate the public.

It drives me crazy when something is really funny and someone says, “That’s hysterical!”

I did my homework to spare you some time, and this is what Merriam-Webster says:

“From the Greek notion that hysteria was peculiar to women and caused by disturbances of the uterus; 1 : a psychoneurosis marked by emotional excitability and disturbances of the psychic, sensory, vasomotor, and visceral functions

2 : behavior exhibiting overwhelming or unmanageable fear or emotional excess.”

So, here is where it gets annoying to me. There is nothing in that definition about “funny” or “humor” or anything to that effect. I see “uterus” and “psychoneurosis” and “unmanageable.” Which leads me to the next place of it being a derogatory term towards women.

Am I overreacting? Has it become so common to use “hysterical” interchangeably with “hilarious” that they both mean “really funny”?

Thanks,
I don’t want to be called hysterical because I know I’m not

Dear Well, You’re A Little Overinvested In This,

In order: yes, and yes.

My dictionary has the same definition as yours, but it also has “hysterics” listed directly below that, to wit: “a fit of uncontrollable laughter or crying.”The use of “hysterical” as a synonym for “hilarious” is probably a reverse-engineered construction from “in hysterics.”I’ve heard this locution my whole life, and if it’s in the context of something being funny, it wouldn’t occur to me to find it offensive.

And yeah, when a woman is expressing a strong emotion and that emotion is dismissed as “hysterical,” that’s sexist.But to get offended over a connotation that nobody else is drawing?Like, you say something really funny, and your friend tells you you’re hysterical…you can’t figure out from the situation that the comment has nothing to do with your uterus, except that, coincidentally, you have one?

Do not go looking for more sexism than already exists in the world.There’s no shortage as it is.

Hi Sars,

With the movie United 93 coming out, I am having a mild relapse of my 9/11 horror. No, I haven’t seen it, and I won’t. Just the mention of the movie, that day, is enough. My eyes fill with tears for no reason I can think of, and I search obsessively for information about how people died, what we did to save them, anything. Yet when I find it I’m devastated. That photo called “The Falling Man”? I hadn’t seen it before last night. I could have done without seeing it ever.

Sars, I wasn’t in New York. I was across the fucking continent. I’m in California. For the entire year after 9/11 I had to leave the room whenever anyone brought it up. After the first anniversary I was better, but still I can’t get over it. I weep when I think of the firefighters.

I know I probably should get therapy. That’s actually not a question, really. I was wondering…how do YOU deal with it? How the fuck? You were there. You saw everything happen. You lived in the middle of it. But you’re still functioning.

How does the human mind and spirit continue after such a thing? And, not incidentally, how could anyone have come out of the concentration camps sane? How does kindness continue?

Great. I’m crying again.

Dear Crying,

You know, I’ve said this before, but I think that in some ways it’s a little easier for those of us who were there — right there — because, as horrifying and scary as it was, as much as I would never want to go through it again, as much as I was kind of in shock at the time and not necessarily processing everything, I was in fact dealing with it pretty directly.I saw the building come down, I ran, I walked home, I spent four hours trying to get out of the city — but it was happening all around me and I was having to cope with it.(Keeping in mind of course that I was very lucky in terms of what I did have to cope with, relatively speaking.)

For people who weren’t there or didn’t live in the city at the time, it’s different, I would imagine; I suspect that, for some of those people, it’s harder to get their minds around it, and as a result, it’s harder to incorporate that grief (or fear, or both) into the mental landscape, because they haven’t really had to in order to go about their daily lives.We have to go through subway bag checks; you don’t.Our terror alert level is always at orange, regardless of where the rest of the country’s is; yours isn’t.I have to take trains across bridges to get to meetings, sometimes right after the mayor has announced that NYPD Counter-Terrorism is on high alert; you don’t.And this is not about “oh, poor me” or “you don’t Get It,” at all.It’s that New Yorkers see and feel the effects of that day every day since it happened — plaques on firehouses, cops in riot gear, using the Empire State Building to orient north instead of the towers — and we’ve had to incorporate that into the business of living, and it’s not that we’ve gotten a callus, exactly.It’s that things changed around here and we had to change with them, or leave.And some people did leave, which I understand.I’m a little easier in my mind not living two blocks from the Empire State anymore, frankly.

With all that lengthily said, I think you do need therapy, because I think this is not about 9/11 at all, in the end.I think there is some sort of…I don’t know, steam, molten underground lake, whatever, of sadness or deep-seated dread inside of you, and it’s either from an event entirely separate from 9/11, or it’s a lifetime of little sadnesses and unshed tears that has no other way out of you except for you to fixate on and mourn this.Reacting to 9/11 in this way…well, what other reaction is there, really, but nearly five years down the line, I’m not sure its noticeable presence in your emotional life is about the attacks.I’m pretty sure it’s something else; it’s just taking 9/11 form because, whatever the other thing is, you don’t want to deal with it, or subconsciously think you can’t.

People and kindness continue because they can, and must.That church I passed on my way uptown that day, with the water cups and the orange slices — I don’t know for sure what time that was, but imagine what must have happened there.Imagine someone listening to the radio and figuring out that, soon, weary travelers would be streaming past the front door covered in dust, and saying, “Okay, here’s the plan.”Imagine the staff in the galley kitchen behind the nave, chopping oranges like it was a contest, lining up the little plastic cups and filling up each row, getting ready — how fast they had to do that.And it got done.Yes, there’s The Falling Man.There’s also a little church where the staff thought maybe some Vitamin C would help, and when a window into grace opens like that, you’ve got to look inside.It’s the only way to go on.

Dear Sars,

My husband and I are considering moving to New York City in the next year or so. I am getting a master’s degree in Children’s Literature and am hoping to trade my humdrum job in marketing for a job in children’s publishing, doing what I’ve always wanted to do. New York, of course, is the crème de la crème for that sort of thing.

Now, I grew up in suburbia, though very near to both Baltimore and D.C. However…I’ve never really had the chance to try out being a City Girl before. At this point, I am torn between the fear of taking a chance with a completely new life in a completely new place, and the unbelievable excitement of having the life I’ve always wanted.

Pretty much, if I end up getting the job of my dreams, we are going to move. I couldn’t bear the idea of going through life thinking I passed up the chance to fulfill my goals because I was scared. Husband is all for it, supportive, everything. But my question is, is New York City (I think we’d probably be looking for a place in Queens/Astoria area) really THAT different a place to live in? I’ve visited a bunch of times, have friends/family there, et cetera, but never really got the vibe of the place as a home rather than a tourist attraction. I know you are a seasoned New Yorker, and thought maybe you would have some insight for us.

So what’s the truth (for you, that is,I’m sure it’s different for everyone) about being a New Yorker? Is it scary? Exciting? Always new and interesting? Or just another place to live?

Sincerely,
Chewing on the Big Apple

Dear Chew,

It’s all of those things.It’s scary, it’s exciting, it’s fascinating, it’s a boring hassle, it’s…just where we live.A lot of it, you’re not going to get until you live here, until you’ve lived here a year and you know your neighborhood, the dry cleaner doesn’t have to ask how your shirts should be done, you know which subway entrance shaves off two minutes of walking underground, you know where and when to catch cabs, you know how to layer for a March day.

But that’s anywhere.New York is unnecessarily intimidating to some people in that regard, but if you can think of it like I do, like hundreds of small cities all mooshed together, it’s less overwhelming — and again, you’d have the same experience getting to know Baltimore or Toronto or L.A.And every city has its unique quirks, of course, but you’ll have New York’s knocked after a while.

Living here is eminently doable; you’re lucky, because you’re coming in with a wing man.Don’t overthink it…and don’t count anything you saw as a tourist towards your decision, because that stuff is pretty much irrelevant to daily life here (except as sidewalk cloggery to be routed around by whatever means necessary).If you go to the Empire State Building again, it’ll be because there’s a drugstore inside.

You know the old saying that, when you go on a trip, you should pack, do your budget, and then take half of what’s in your suitcase and twice as much money as you’d planned?Same kind of deal.It’s expensive, and it adds up, but a lot of the baggage you’ve got as far as how scary it is to live here is just not necessary.You’ll be fine.

Dear Sars,

How do I break up with someone who won’t let me break up with them?

I have been dating T for almost three years.I just graduated from college last June, and he graduated this past December.After graduation I moved back to my home state on the other coast, because of my total disdain for the state I went to college in.There’s nothing that wrong with it, it’s just not for me.I know T plans to stay there for at least the next two years because of the job he has…giant argument, the first.He accuses me of abandoning him, not visiting enough…blah blah separation-cakes.

My problem now is that I really want to break up, not because of the long-distance thing, but because I don’t really think we have the same life goals anymore.He likes to talk about how many kids we’ll have, and thinks living in L.A. or NYC would be terrible.I personally hope that my current job gets some openings in L.A. so that I can go.He hates trying new foods and never travels while those are my two favorite hobbies.I know that I’m too young to get married, and I think I need to get a little more life experience before I really commit to someone.Unfortunately, he says things to me like, “I can’t wait until we get married.”

How am I supposed to break up with someone after they say that?When we fight, I feel like it’s a product of the fact that we’re growing apart in general, and should break up.He says, “I don’t want us to break up just because of the long-distance thing,”as if that the only thing wrong with our relationship is distance…it’s not.I love him.But I don’t think I want to marry him.

He says that if we break up he wouldn’t know what to do with his life…I feel trapped, like I’m only staying in this relationship to keep him happy.His life in general isn’t so hot right now (traffic violation court date, broken arm, crappy friends), and he frequently tells me that I’m the only good thing in his life.So how do I tell him I don’t want to be in his life anymore?

Don’t Want To Be Cruel, Just Don’t Want To Be With You Anymore

Dear Oy,

You…tell him that.”I don’t want to be cruel, but I don’t want to be with you anymore.””I’m sorry, but this relationship isn’t working for me anymore.””I can’t be with you.I’m unhappy, so I’m ending things.”

He’s going to be hurt; there’s no way around it.He’s not compatible with you; there’s no way around that, either.You don’t get to break up with a guy and have him not get hurt or mad, but if you want an omelet, you’ve got to break some damn eggs.

Sitting on the other end of the phone all “…eesh” whenever he brings up getting married isn’t really any less cruel than cutting him loose and moving on — and letting him move on.You’re giving him false hope, and you’re letting something you don’t want run your life.Grow a pair and break it off, because it doesn’t sound to me like you do love him, actually.It sounds like you’re used to having a boyfriend, but you’ve just got done saying it’s not enough, so: end it.

Share!
Pin Share


Tags:        

Comments are closed.