Oh my crap, where to begin with this…”movie.” It has so many serious problems, I can’t even decide which one is primarily at fault, but I think it’s a “flawed in its inception” issue, because …

I saw this a bit ago, but forgot to write it up here.It was good, and yet it was annoying.The acting was good, and yet it was…annoying.I liked watching it, and yet I kind of …

Pretty good; I’d expected better reviews after the seemingly endless pre-release hype, but it’s actually quite good despite some lukewarmness in the press.It just suffers from the usual problems biopics have — too much symbolic …

I hadn’t seen it in years, and while it’s very good, I remember it as much funnier. Blasphemy, I know, but there you have it. A few gags got too much play while a few …

It didn’t work for me.I liked the acting; Penelope Cruz is good (although she doesn’t look like any of her “family” members, while they do somewhat look like they could be related to each other, …

I should write an essay one of these days on the movies that I can’t not watch when they come on TV, because this is destined to become one — it is hilariously bad, overacted, …

I liked it more than most people, because I always like Shyamalan more than most people; his problem, as always, is that he’s so focused on the build-up, he botches the follow-through.I didn’t know the …

I’ve seen the movie three times, and I still don’t think I know what in the Sam Hill is going on.Seriously.Can someone explain it to me?I mean, she’s blonde, she’s dead, she’s brunette and alive, …

I expected to enjoy this more than I did.The performances are outstanding, and parts of it are very satisfying, but the writing is too on the nose; the kid’s reaction to shooting Quick Mike is …

Glark and I watched it on hotel pay-per-view, and no, they didn’t pay us, but they should have, because daaaaaaamn is it bad.The name actors are adequate, although it’s clear that Scott Speedman should probably …