Baseball

“I wrote 63 songs this year. They’re all about Jeter.” Just kidding. The game we love, the players we hate, and more.

Culture and Criticism

From Norman Mailer to Wendy Pepper — everything on film, TV, books, music, and snacks (shut up, raisins), plus the Girls’ Bike Club.

Donors Choose and Contests

Helping public schools, winning prizes, sending a crazy lady in a tomato costume out in public.

Stories, True and Otherwise

Monologues, travelogues, fiction, and fart humor. And hens. Don’t forget the hens.

The Vine

The Tomato Nation advice column addresses your questions on etiquette, grammar, romance, and pet misbehavior. Ask The Readers about books or fashion today!

Home » The Vine

The Vine: March 13, 2008

Submitted by on March 13, 2008 – 11:50 AMNo Comment

Hi Sars,

It’s really kind of embarrassing that I have to ask this question — I go to an Ivy League university and while browsing the library page today I noticed the following:

“On this day… The Titanic sunk to the bottom of the North Atlantic Sea.” Um, shouldn’t that be “sank”?

Thanks,

Why Am I Here Again?

Dear Why,

According to Webster’s 11C, either “sank” or “sunk” is correct in the simple past. Garner disagrees: “sink > sank > sunk. So inflected. Occasionally the past participle ousts the simple-past form from its rightful place[.]” He goes on to give examples much like the one you have above.

I’m with Garner; on this day, the Titanic sank, and by this time on that day, the Titanic had already sunk. “Sank” for the simple past, “sunk” for all other tenses save the present.

Share!
Pin Share


Tags:  

Comments are closed.