Baseball

“I wrote 63 songs this year. They’re all about Jeter.” Just kidding. The game we love, the players we hate, and more.

Culture and Criticism

From Norman Mailer to Wendy Pepper — everything on film, TV, books, music, and snacks (shut up, raisins), plus the Girls’ Bike Club.

Donors Choose and Contests

Helping public schools, winning prizes, sending a crazy lady in a tomato costume out in public.

Stories, True and Otherwise

Monologues, travelogues, fiction, and fart humor. And hens. Don’t forget the hens.

The Vine

The Tomato Nation advice column addresses your questions on etiquette, grammar, romance, and pet misbehavior. Ask The Readers about books or fashion today!

Home » The Vine

The Vine: May 23, 2007

Submitted by on May 23, 2007 – 9:16 AMNo Comment

Hi Sars,

I am a professor of graduate studies in the health sciences field. As a scientist, I haven’t been required to take too many English or composition courses, so I would not consider myself any sort of authority on grammar or writing. It seems that my students have even less idea about writing than I do — much of their writing is atrocious. While I could go on all day about their use of non-PC terms to describe individuals with disabilities, one specific writing issue keeps coming up.

A group of students continually use the word “learnt” instead of “learned.” Is this right? I don’t think it is, but I don’t want to say something if I am wrong. Help me, Sars!

The English-ly Challenged Professor

Dear Challenged,

It depends on where your university is. Here’s Garner’s note on “learnt” vs. “learned”: “In AmE, the past tense is learned; in BrE, it’s often learnt. To use learnt in AmE is an affectation.”

So, if you teach at an American institution, you should discourage the use of “learnt.” At a British/other crown territory school, it’s acceptable.

Share!
Pin Share


Tags:  

Comments are closed.