Baseball

“I wrote 63 songs this year. They’re all about Jeter.” Just kidding. The game we love, the players we hate, and more.

Culture and Criticism

From Norman Mailer to Wendy Pepper — everything on film, TV, books, music, and snacks (shut up, raisins), plus the Girls’ Bike Club.

Donors Choose and Contests

Helping public schools, winning prizes, sending a crazy lady in a tomato costume out in public.

Stories, True and Otherwise

Monologues, travelogues, fiction, and fart humor. And hens. Don’t forget the hens.

The Vine

The Tomato Nation advice column addresses your questions on etiquette, grammar, romance, and pet misbehavior. Ask The Readers about books or fashion today!

Home » The Vine

The Vine: April 11, 2006

Submitted by on April 11, 2006 – 4:24 PMNo Comment

Dear Sars,

About six months ago, my family lost our pet. Now, it’s just me and my parents, so to lose the dog that we’ve had since I was five and was my parents’ baby and more like a sibling to me has been pretty hard on us. Penny was pretty healthy right up until she died (she died at the age of 18) but we had about three years where she was clearly going downhill (you know, like losing her hearing and developing arthritis) that we understood it was really going to happen.

I guess I should point out that I am just like my father in personality. We have similar ways of dealing with things, so one of the first things we wanted to do was get another pet. My father has been saying for years he would like to get a beagle (he’s a hunter) but my mother wouldn’t even consider it. No more pets, never again, yes Penny was wonderful and one of a kind but never again.

My dad and I kinda just shrugged. It’s the grief process, everyone deals with it in different ways, and she just wasn’t ready yet. We didn’t press her.

Except that now it’s six months from now, and we would really like another pet. My mother still won’t even TALK about it.

I’m wondering if it has something to do with my maternal grandmother, who isn’t doing too well. We had promised a couple years ago to take her cats when she goes (my grandmother has a touch of the dramatic and pulls promises like that out of us every once in a while) and I think my mother may be concerned about going from a possible no-pet household to a one-dog/two-cat household within the next year or so. Either way she won’t talk about it, which I guess, after all this story, is the point. She didn’t even act like this when her father died.

I know you can’t give me a solution about how to magically help my mother and make her ready for a new pet (grief process, I understand) but it’s not like my mother to not even want to talk about it, and I was just wondering how I could even go about approaching the subject with her that won’t result in an abrupt brush-off.

Thanks for any tips you can give!

There’s a Cold Spot at the End of My Bed

Dear Spot,

Get her a puppy for Mother’s Day and then pretend you don’t speak English if she objects.

Okay, seriously? Sit down with your dad, tell him you think this is ridiculous, and ask him to tell her what you just told me — refusing to even discuss getting another pet is really not reasonable on her part, given that she’s outnumbered in the house by people who do want another pet.

Which she knows, which is why she won’t talk about it. Whatever her reasons — she’s not ready to open her heart to another animal; she doesn’t want the hassle of another pet; she’s worried about your grandma’s cats — she must think the two of you will counter them with reasons of your own, but she thinks that if she simply won’t deal with the subject, you can’t argue with her. Or overrule her.

True on the merits, but immature and not really a workable plan. She’s not the only voting concern in the house, and it’s probably time your father made that point to her. Yes, pets die. Yes, it’s very sad and everyone deals with it differently. But you don’t get new pets to replace the ones who aren’t with you anymore. You get new pets to make new friends and make them a part of the family too, in a different way. And if your mom isn’t ready to do that, that’s okay, but she needs to at least say it in so many words and explain why she’s not keen on a new dog.

I mean, come on. Has she seen a beagle puppy lately?

Sars,

I work at a newspaper, and my editor recently told us that the publisher is
unhappy with the way some people in the office are dressing. I don’t think I
am part of the problem — it’s more the woman who wears sweats during the
week and the people who wear jeans every day. I wear kind of a uniform of
black dress pants, high heels, and nice shirt every day, with some skirts
thrown in when it’s not too cold.

In short, casual Fridays are out. He says Monday through Thursday is
“business” and Fridays are “business casual.” The unwritten rule has been
“jeans and t-shirts are okay on Fridays” but no more.

The term “business casual” has been redefined so often in the last few years
that some of my coworkers and I are struggling to figure out exactly what
this means. I was wondering if you or any readers had any current “office
dress code” definition for this term.

Are we talking khakis and polo shirts? (Ugh.)

Also, any good suggestions on places to buy these “business casual” clothes
online?

Signed,
Just slap a pair of khakis on me

Dear Khaki,

I’m not the greatest person to ask — every day is casual Friday in my “office” — but it’s my impression that a suit is a suit, and everything that isn’t a suit is “business casual”: unmatched separates, or what you describe as your work “uniform.” So, I’d just keep wearing that throughout the week and not worry about it.

Banana Republic.com and J.Crew.com have tons of stuff that seems “business casual” to me, and you can get the whole outfit at those sites — fitted button-down, spring-y skirt, cute kitten heels, and a khaki blazer, with maybe a scarf or a little necklace.

I have a friend whose “business casual” rule of thumb is that, if she wouldn’t come home from work and change into it, it’s okay for the office, if that makes sense. Anyway, I think what you already wear is kosher.

Hi Sars,

Is there a word for an exaggeration to a lesser extent?

I know that hyperbole is an exaggeration for effect, like saying “there were
millions of people at the rally” would emphasize that a lot of people were
there. But if very few people showed and one said “nobody came to the
rally,” is it still hyperbole?

This question stems from a distant memory of a once-mentioned term back in
sophomore English, and I was wondering if it rings any particular bells for
you.

K

Dear K,

Uh…”exaggeration”? Hyperbole is exaggeration for effect, as you say, but regardless of the degree of said exaggeration, if it’s for effect, it’s still hyperbole; in other words, if I have a lot of things to do, whether I say I have a thousand things to do or a billion squillion things to do, it’s…still hyperbole. Because I only have 37 things to do.

If what you actually mean is the term of under-playing the severity of something — i.e. “What’d you do yesterday?” “Oh, nothing, really. Went to Vegas, got married” — that’s meiosis, which you can read more about here. But the example you give is still actually hyperbole, because it’s exaggeration, not diminishment, even though the number is smaller.

Hiya Sars,

I have a friend, Adam, that I have known for quite a
while. We have always been close, the volume of
communication waxes and wanes as with most people, but
for the most part we are pretty tight. We met in
college and have since moved apart, but keep in contact
via telephone.

In October, he left me a message during a very busy
week. At the end of the week, I called him back and
left him a message. No call back. It’s now months later. I’ve left a few other messages, from “Hey,
give me a call,” to “Um, I know you’re busy, but just
let me know you are alive.” Nothing. Not too worrying,
but a little unusual. Most of the time we at least
leave each other “Very busy, call you soon!” messages
or emails or something. I tried to call about a week
ago, and his phone is turned off. As in “this account no
longer exists.” At this point, I’m at a loss, I drop
him a quick email, but, honestly, he never checks it,
so I doubt he’s even gotten that.

Now I start to freak out a little with the worry. I
don’t know his family very well, so if something
horrible happened I wouldn’t necessarily find out.
Even when I know I’m being illogical, I sometimes get
a little panicky if I don’t know what’s going on. So,
more for piece of mind than anything else, I Googled
his name, figuring if I didn’t see news articles about
fiery car crashes or anything, I could at least stop
thinking about the worst-case scenarios. No car
crashes, but I do find a staff page for a college in
my state that says he is their newest professor. So
basically, he has moved halfway across the country,
back to my state, and hasn’t called or emailed or
anything.

Now, finally the question. What do I do with this
information? It has his work email and his office
number on the site. My dilemma: do I use it? I have no
idea how to proceed here. While I am rather peeved
about the dropping-off-the-earth thing, it’s great
he’s closer and I’m thrilled about the job. At the
same time, I’m wondering if he didn’t tell me because
for some reason I don’t know about he has decided he
doesn’t want to be my friend anymore. Everything
seemed really cool between us up until he stopped
calling, but how can I really know what’s going on in
the head of someone so far away (or so I thought)? It
also seems rather stalker-ish to just call someone on
a number they never gave you that you found on the
internet. Lastly, do I even want to be friends with
someone who would pull something like this? Argh.

Thanks,
Hanging by the Telephone

Dear Hanging,

I’d just drop him an email at work and explain how you found the email — he didn’t call back, you got worried, disconnected phone, Google, et cetera, hi! Don’t overthink this, which frankly I think you’re doing. People get busy and bogged down, mean to return phone calls and don’t and feel guilty and still don’t — there’s not necessarily intent there, and you have no real reason to assume that he doesn’t want you to know where he is.

If he doesn’t respond to that missive, then you’ll know, but before you know, don’t assume that any of this is necessarily About You. Just drop him a line and be normal.

Dear Sars,

I’ve been invited to present a research paper at an academic conference in
June. My paper title contains the word “d__d,” a direct quote from one of my
subject’s short stories. (Writing in the early 1900s, she chose not to spell
out the word — which reminds me of an Onion article from a couple of years
ago, something like “Area Woman Has No Idea What Missing Letters Might
Mean.”)

Anyway, my question is this: when I read the title out loud at the
beginning of my presentation, how do I deal with the word? Do I simply say
“damned,” even though that’s not the quote? Do I make the “d” sound and then
pause? Please help me avoid sounding stupid — for the first few seconds,
anyway — in front of a bunch of people I respect.

Thanks,
Once You Answer, I’ll Actually Have to Write the D__d Thing

Dear Get Writin’,

I’d just say “damned,” if that’s clearly what the author meant. If it were one of those infernal Victorian “Mrs. M______” things where you just have no damn idea what last name is intended, that would be different, but if it’s obvious to all that the dashed letters are “amne,” then “damned” is what you should say.

Definitely don’t pause between the Ds; that’s going to sound really weird.

Share!
Pin Share


Tags:            

Leave a comment!

Please familiarize yourself with the Tomato Nation commenting policy before posting.
It is in the FAQ. Thanks, friend.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>